Sunday, April 10, 2016

Filling in the Gaps


Filling in the Gaps

http://www.homeofpurdue.com/visitpics/courthousesquare1900s.jpg
Urban flow in old Lafayette
          We've all had that moment when we were walking through an old part of town, enjoying the line of shops or the row of houses when suddenly there was a huge empty space. A gap in the flow. A hole in the fabric. Aside from being visually unpleasant, it also discourages you from walking any further.
Though still in use, these empty spaces stand in stark contrast with the historic fabric of the old city

      Despite being remarkably intact for a city its size, Lafayette has many areas where historic buildings have been demolished, leaving empty gaps or spaces. In many cases, reconstruction of the structures that stood there is not feasible nor practical. How do we as a community restore the lost urban fabric of yesterday while moving forward? How do we fill in the gaps without damaging the historical integrity of our old city? The answer; infill. Infill is defined by the National League of Cities as new development that is sited on vacant or undeveloped land within an existing neighborhood.

New infill in historic Lockerbie Square in downtown Indianapolis
Good infill needs to respect the form, style, and fabric of our old city.

FORM  


    Creating new structures that are harmonious with our historic fabric doesn't necessarily require copying historic styles. New structures in historic neighborhoods can respect their surroundings by following the shape and form of the historic buildings around them. Roger Trancik stated in his book, Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design, that infill should "respect the existing silhouette of buildings and landscapes" and "respect existing rhythms of facades and spatial elements" (pg. 229).

This new house in Indianapolis is clearly new but respects the historic houses around it
  This house in Indianapolis was constructed on an empty lot (presumably where a historic building had once stood many years ago) close to many 19th-century houses. While the house is clearly modern, it doesn't distract or conflict with the older buildings around it, but it doesn't copy them either. Compare the new house with the old structure in the left of the photo. If you just focus on the shape, they are remarkably similar. Both have a projecting overhang of similar size, the same window and door proportions and materials. 

The end product is a new structure that respects and contributes to the neighborhood while meeting the needs and tastes of a 21st century family. As a growing and important city, this is exactly the kind of structure Lafayette's old city needs. 

                                             
STYLE
 While form is important, style is also crucial in redeveloping the empty pockets of our old city. The style of an infill project can make or break its contribution to the neighborhood around it. As stated before, new buildings don't need to copy the styles of yesterday in order to contribute to our historic urban fabric, they simply need to respect the styles around them the same way they need to respect the form. Diane Suchman proclaimed in Developing Successful Infill Housing  that "In the best communities, all the buildings are well-behaved and respect the prevailing style and character of their neighbors." (pg. 59)

Image from styleweekly.com

    Here is an example of infill that has the density and relationship with the street that COULD have made it good infill if it weren't for the conflicting style. Do you think this structure respects its neighbors? Instead of trying to use a style that respected the historic neighborhood around it, this structure was designed to conflict with it. The result? A structure that disrupts the historic flow of the street and distracts from the old architecture around it. In old Lafayette neighborhoods already suffering from lost historic buildings, a design such as this could do more damage than good!
Photo courtesy of Bobbie Lutes Photography
 In this example, we have the recently completed Lafayette Community Bank. The new structure is only a block away from our iconic courthouse, placing it in the very oldest part of town. The structure's style is clearly traditional but doesn't copy the old buildings around it. Its windows honor many of the historic windows downtown, and its heavy cornice (trim) follow the style of downtown, yet it doesn't pass as a 19th century building. A style like this doesn't distract from the historic architecture downtown but instead quietly contributes to the reconstruction of the old city's historic fabric. 

   FABRIC 

 While style and form are important, the fabric of the neighborhood is more important in planning long-term infill projects. The fabric of a neighborhood is the consistent development, the distribution of that development, and the consistent form and size of the structures within the neighborhood. For example, the urban fabric of downtown is multi-story commercial structures that are built up to the sidewalk while the fabric of St. Mary's is single family homes built in close proximity to each other. So, when constructing new infill projects, we have to ask ourselves "is this appropriate to the urban fabric?" 

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/64/72/7d/64727d47eb1bf42cdb6f91c151406f60.jpg
Respecting the urban fabric, you're doing it wrong (photo from gopixdatabase.com) 


  The image above is an example of new development that does not respect the fabric of a neighborhood. Not only is this not harmonious with the built environment, it's also historically inaccurate. New structures in neighborhoods need to respect the density and developmental type of structure (is it commercial? Residential? Industrial? Etc.).


After photo courtesy of Bobbie Lutes Photography
 The before image above is an example of development disrespecting the fabric of an old Lafayette neighborhood. The Midwest Rentals in the historic Centennial neighborhood violated the urban fabric of a historic residential neighborhood by putting an industrial compound in the center of a residential street. Not only did this complex lower property values in the neighborhood, it also damaged the historic fabric of the street. The new row houses that are replacing the crumbling Midwest Rentals respect the historic residential neighborhood (which contains many row houses already) and again, contribute to the historic fabric of the old city. 

 As downtown continues to be revived and rejuvenation makes its way through more of the old city, we need to keep these principles in mind when we fill in the gaps. We want new buildings in the old city to respect and contribute to our city's historic fabric, not destroy or disrupt it. However, such policies of good design are difficult to have in neighborhoods lacking historic protections. In order to push for good design, we need to first get our historic neighborhoods protected. What point is there in building new structures to respect our historic urban fabric if that fabric keeps getting destroyed? 

Monday, April 4, 2016

It's All Greek to Me!


                                     It’s all Greek to Me!

           Lafayette was established in 1825, on the eve of the country’s 50th birthday. Greek revival architecture was becoming all the rage in the United States, especially following the War of 1812. As a young nation, Americans naturally looked to the birthplace of democracy, Greece, for inspiration in their architecture. Lafayette, a booming river town was no exception and quickly built structures up in the style of the Greeks. 

Lafayette's previous Greek Revival Courthouse
Greek Revival architecture is surprisingly simple by later Victorian standards. It follows the shape and form of ancient Greek temples and structures. According to The Resource Guide from Wabash Valley Trust, Greek Revival structures are generally square or rectangular with low-pitched roofs, symmetry, dentil trim, and classical columns. 


The lower image is an example of dentil trim. Source: http://oldstonehousemuseum.org and http://www.invitinghome.com


Throughout Lafayette there are many grand examples of Greek Revival Architecture. Here are a few examples.



Another interesting aspect of Greek Revival is how often it was changed within our city. As the Greek Revival style fell out of favor after the Civil War, new styles like Italianate and Second-Empire began to take over. Many stylish Lafayette residents wanted to keep up with the trends without necessarily building a new house. Instead, many Lafayette residents replaced their Greek Revival details with Italianate trims and details. A good example is the Jones - Carnahan House. The house was constructed in 1849 in the Greek Revival by Mark Jones, a local district judge. In 1873, when Jones moved out and the Carnahans (you may know this name from Carnahan Hall downtown) moved in, they had the facade remodeled to keep up with the Italianate Style.  Although the trim has changed, the shape has remained essentially Greek Revival.
The Jones-Carnahan House (Courtesy of Bobbie Lutes Photography)

 Since Greek Revival can be very simple, it makes it very easy to destroy or obscure the original architecture.  For example, this house in Centennial was built in the mid-19th century in the Greek revival style. It’s very simple yet in its original condition has a beauty that contributes to the character of the historic Centennial neighborhood. Centennial is NOT a protected district unfortunately, so guidelines for historic preservation are powerless in these renovations.
Before Photos from Historiccentennial.org
 
 Sadly, renovations that have removed the cornice, downsized the windows, and original siding have made this house look more at home in a newer suburban part of town than the historic old city.




While areas such as Main street and parts of 9th Street Hill are protected, much of the city’s Greek Revival architecture is unprotected.  This lack of protection was brought front and center when St. Mary’s demolished a  Greek revival at Columbia and 13th streets (despite major opposition and efforts by neighbors and local groups) and Central Presbyterian demolished a Greek Revival at South and 8th. These houses had been standing since slavery was a legal institution, since Lincoln was president and the country was torn apart by war. They had been standing through both world wars, the rise of the automobile, the cold war and to modern day. What did them in? A need for a playground and green space.

Last image from architectural-metal.com


These structures have been demolished for a few years now, and neither playground or green space has been constructed since, leaving only empty land where Lafayette heritage once stood.We can take this loss and mourn or we can push for better protections for our remaining historic neighborhoods and landmarks.